Spencer
Fitz-Gibbon
As Caroline Lucas told the New Statesman
recently, “If you were told the plane you
were about to board had a 50:50 chance of
crashing, would you still take the flight?
Probably not. So you might question why we
in the EU are playing a form of Russian
roulette with our future, by accepting a
target for reducing emissions that
scientists say would give us only a 50:50
chance of avoiding catastrophic climate
change.”
That’s how serious the Copenhagen climate
summit in December is. Unfortunately the
current EU target is a derisory 20% cut by
2020, grudgingly moving to 30% in the event
of an international agreement.
At Copenhagen green campaigners generally
will be demanding that EU leaders agree to
cut emissions by 40% by 2020 at the very
least. The Green Party’s Manifesto for a
Sustainable Society argues that the UK must
make 90% cuts in all greenhouse gases by
2030, including serious year-on-year cuts
starting right now – and of course we have
signed up to the 10:10 initiative,
encouraging every individual, every
business and every organisation in the UK
to commit to a 10% cut in their emissions
during 2010. It’s important that the richer
countries take such a stance, not least to
recognise our greater historical
responsibility for the greenhouse effect.