An
alternative life:
Kew Bridge Eco-Village
In an effort
to highlight the pressing global issues of land
rights, climate change and lack of sustainability
and biodiversity within our modern and
ever-developing societies, The Land Is Ours
campaign swooped on a derelict plot of land in
Brentford, London, and began establishing an
Eco-Village community. Words and photos by Jack
Laurenson
Writing this
article nearly a year on from the day the
village was founded in early June 2009, I'm
impressed and somewhat humbled by how much
the Eco-Village achieved and, although they
have recently been evicted, how a new
national movement seems to be gaining
momentum.
I returned to the village in December 2009
after a long summer working in India, and
some six months after they took over the
land. Looking down onto the site from Kew
Bridge was an almost familiar vision. It
resembled not the image I recalled from the
day back in June when the site was first
occupied, but more like the many eclectic
slum villages that are scattered around all
of India. Messy, chaotic and
under-developed, but also warm and
welcoming with an obvious presence of
community rapport that is lacking in much
of 'developed' society. The Eco-Village is
situated in a relatively affluent London
suburb and obviously lacks many of the
socio-economic troubles of the
poverty-stricken Indian slum communities,
but it still reflects many of the more
pleasant aspects of these crowded and
atmospheric townships.
The village effectively functioned as a
democracy, with all important decisions
being made by consensus agreement.
Everybody seemed to get along and to have a
role to play, be it cooking, maintenance,
teaching, building or art and hospitality.
Much effort had obviously gone into the
village's physical appearance and the
meticulously planned wood-chip paths wound
around the village between the small herb
and vegetable gardens and individually
hand-constructed wooden homes. They were as
much works of modern art as practical,
semi-permanent abodes.
Cindy, one of the founders at the Kew
Bridge Eco-Village, told me that the
movement simply wanted to demonstrate that
it was possible to live differently. "It
would've been easier to establish it in the
countryside but it wouldn't have had the
same effect and not as many people would
have seen it, we wouldn't have got the
message across, even living in a city you
can dramatically reduce your carbon
footprint and be much more sustainable."
The village could have grown much more of
their own food being located outside London
and had access to more naturally occurring
resources like wood, wild berries and
mushrooms. Being on an old industrial site
with poor quality, heavily polluted soil
meant much of the village's food was
salvaged waste from supermarkets.
Gareth, another veteran founding member and
full-time activist, told me that
supermarkets all over the country throw out
enough perfectly good food to feed entire
communities. Indeed, I saw this for myself.
"You wouldn't believe the stuff they throw
out, we've had people come back with bags
of steak and crates of beer, boxes full of
bread and milk, not to mention loads of
vegetables. You have to be careful
obviously, especially with meat, but much
of it is chucked out well before its due
date." This was a damning indictment of
wasteful corporations and bureaucracy, made
ever more potent in my mind having recently
returned from a drought-stricken, starving
India.
The site, which was unused and left
derelict for over twenty years, was a prime
one-acre patch right next to the River
Thames. Since obtaining it in 2003, the St
George development company were happy to
capitalise on its value by leaving it empty
and overgrown while they finished luxury
developments elsewhere. Recent years
planning applications for the site were
declined because St George continually
failed to reach compulsory standards
regarding important issues like required
percentages of affordable housing in
developments. Subsequent discussions saw St
George's plans approved.
One resident
said to me that he suspected; "somebody had
probably received a fat brown envelope" and
the local council admitted it was not
willing to use public money to pay a
£250,000 legal bill to challenge the
conclusion in court, despite unanimous
condemnation from all of the local
community groups. Justice, it would seem,
is expensive.
Local people who I spoke to felt rightfully
disenfranchised and abandoned. The new
proposal from St. George consists of 164
flats in a huge nine storey development
containing only 13% affordable housing; the
development mostly consists of luxury
penthouses and apartments. One local woman,
Kaz Mackie, a cancer sufferer, spoke to a
local journalist of her feelings; "It is
mainly disabled and elderly people who live
on the ground floor and they are going to
be submerged into darkness... I feel our
views have been completely ignored." St
George politely ignored my requests for an
interview.
Local residents are quick to state the
abandoned site was an eyesore, but quicker
to condemn the plans for yet another block
of expensive flats. "What we need is more
affordable social housing or community
gardens and parks to rejuvenate the area,
not luxury apartments and expensive bars"
one resident told me in the pub next door
to the site. A charming and lively family
run pub that is sadly a planned casualty of
the development: it's being demolished.
The Eco-Village quickly became a strong and
popular community catalyst and the free
organic cafe was regularly home to locals
sipping green tea or school children
learning about permaculture, biodiversity,
peace and art. Michael, one of the
villagers and general handyman around the
community, was responsible for rigging up
much of the structures to wind power and
installing solar panels. He told me that he
thinks the village had a strong impact on
the local area; "It's changing the local
communities' way of thinking towards more
ethical living, people want to be more
sustainable in their everyday lives, even
in cities... The village is giving an
insight into things that aren't generally
taught in schools... And the attention we
are getting, is perhaps the local people's
last bastion of hope of stopping this
development from going ahead."
Sadly, the site is empty again now,
derelict and soulless. It is the wasteland
it was before, the homes have been smashed
up and the occupants evicted. The herb
gardens and flowerbeds trampled beneath the
feet of clumsy bailiffs. The smell of wood
smoke, grass and green tea is gone too,
soon to be replaced with that of cement,
asphalt and rubber. The music around the
campfire has gone and the children wanting
to learn about peace and sustainability
will have to look elsewhere.
I'm sitting with Lou and Gareth in
Parliament Square; it's a beautiful English
summer day. With us are dozens of
activists. Many of the Eco-Villagers have
taken their arguments directly to
Parliament, to the very epicentre of
British government, and here have formed
the Democracy Village. Here, they cannot be
ignored. The Eco-Village could now become a
self-sustaining social movement. With so
much abandoned land in this country being
hoarded and wasted by companies, there will
never be a shortage of places for them to
go, grow, build and protest. All over the
country, similar projects are popping up
and momentum is growing. I remember asking
Lou how she would like to see the Kew
Bridge Eco-Village end. She replied; "It
will end how it is supposed to end, and
something new will begin. It's not about
the destination, it's about the journey."
▾