Radical roots
Dear editor,
The debate on NHS reforms is an interesting one,
and the intervention by Alan Milburn particularly
so. It is a pity that the Green Party is not
engaging with the spirit of reform and change in
this and other issues but simply retreats to a
defence of the status quo and a championing of
service providers whilst sidelining the needs and
aspirations of users of public services.
Whilst it is right, in my view, that the Green
Party should champion the principle of public
service and services we have to be careful that
our position isn’t simply one of knee jerk
reaction to reform and a defence of vested
interests. When I joined the Green Party in 1981
it was because I saw it as a party that
championed reform and radicalism but many of our
pronouncements now seem to be backing a very
conservative position, just like Labour, and are
very frustrating and disappointing. Can we get
out of this box and develop really challenging
policies and ideas that question people’s
perceptions and positions and look to a real
progressive agenda rather than one that simply
defends the status quo?
It isn’t good for politics when the only radical
agenda is that of the right whilst the Left
simply retreats into a position of nay saying.
David
Ford, Shipley Green Party
Detrimental to democracy
Dear editor,
There were vacancies on my Parish Council and my
request to be co-opted was accepted.
I attended my first meeting in July and an early
item of business was processing a payment of £80
to the Borough Council, for non-contested
election expenses. This is quite a large sum out
of the budget of a Parish Council and I asked
what was provided for this – it appears to have
been three posters for display and
"administrative support". The Clerk then
expressed relief that there had not been a
contested election; a neighbouring council had
been billed for over £6000, having been quoted
£4000.
I was astounded and shocked. This system
encourages councils to refrain from encouraging
new people to put themselves up for election, so
there is a financial incentive to discourage
elections. I believe these facts are very little
known and, if it is a widespread practice, the
public should be made aware of it.
Chris
Bluemel, Southampton Green candidate
Dear
editor,
The prospect of the number of MPs being reduced
to 500 may be welcomed in some political
quarters, but the Green Party needs to think
about long term strategy before endorsing this.
If parliament were devolving its powers down to
democratically-elected regional assemblies there
might well be a case for such a reduction. As it
stands, changes based on numerically equalised
constituencies, which involve boundary changes,
will lessen the representation of distinctive
communities.
In largely agricultural areas with a sparse
population, representation will be weakened over
such large tracts of land and returning a Green
MP made even harder.
We need to strengthen the call for devolution of
powers to regional assemblies, which are defined
in terms of the electorate feeling they belong to
them.
Likewise, greater powers should be given to town
and city councils, so decisions are made as close
as possible to the people who are affected by
them.
John
Lloyd (Cllr), South Shropshire Green
Party
▾