The party
leader, Bob Brown in Tasmania, polled the largest ever
Green vote in any state - more than 18 per cent of the
primary vote. The overall Senate vote grew from 917,000
in 2004 to 1,143,000 (9 per cent) in 2007, and the
Greens clearly overtook the National party (which
usually works in coalition with the conservative
Liberal Party) to become the third party overall.

In the
state of Victoria the Greens exceeded 10 per cent
for the first time in the Senate vote, and in the
lower house seat of Melbourne, Adam Bandt finished
second, the first time that a “minor” party has
achieved that feat in Australia. On a
two-candidate preferred basis, the result was
Labour 54.7 per cent, Greens 45.3 per cent.
The Greens contested every lower house seat and
attracted a total of 8% of the votes there, but it
remains an extremely difficult challenge to win a seat
in the House of Representatives, and growing their
Senate presence is likely to remain the focus of
efforts at the next election.
Commentators suggested that Green voters were
influential in the Labour Party winning a number of
seats. (Under Australia’s preferential voting system,
electors can choose to vote “1” Green, but if that
candidate isn’t elected their vote is transferred on to
the second candidate of their choice.)
A spokesman for the party said that it was now well
placed to put pressure on the new Labour government of
Kevin Rudd, although the situation was complex in the
Senate. Mathematically, the government has to rely for
passing legislation through the upper house on the
Greens, the highly conservative Family First senator
and an independent senator all voting with it.
There is, however, one conservative senator, Barnaby
Joyce, who has already moved from the left to the
right, and might well move back again. “And given that
this is a very conservative Labour government, it is
not unlikely that on some issues they will do a deal
with the
Liberals.”
The first priority was, the spokesman said, to push the
new prime minister as far as possible on climate change
issues. “He used them very cleverly during the election
campaign but his policies are still very weak, and
Labour is still trying to use the Howard rhetoric
suggesting that there is a competition between climate
change policy and economic growth.”
The Greens’ climate change spokesperson, Senator
Christine Milne, has called on the Rudd government not
to wait for an international agreement for post-Kyoto,
but to start cutting domestic emissions - worldwide
among the highest per capita of any country -
drastically now.
The party has developed an energy efficiency policy,
EASI, which would retrofit all 7.4 million homes in
Australia with efficiency measures and if fully
implemented would reduce greenhouse emissions by close
to 30 million tonnes each year. (The Greens note that
most Australian homes are without basic insulation,
shading, or efficient lighting and water heating.)
Rudd’s policies on renewables were “pretty solid”, the
Greens’ spokesman said, but the Greens were trying to
push that further, while also tackling the fact that
Labour was largely ignoring the huge potential of
energy efficiency. Other key efforts would be fighting
plans to expand uranium exports, and the huge pulp mill
planned for Tasmania - which will increase Australia’s
greenhouse gas emissions by 2 per cent.
Tackling electoral rules that disenfranchise many
Australians living overseas was another issue on the
Green agenda. Those voters - and it is estimated 1
million of Australia’s 23 million population live
overseas - are concentrated in London, and there was a
concerted Greens campaign here for the election, with
which Green Party of England and Wales members
assisted.

This is a busy time for the antipodean Green parties,
with the New Zealanders next up for an election; it
must be held by November this year. There are also many
New Zealand voters in London, and a campaign has been
established to get their Green votes - if you would
like to help please contact James Shaw
jamespeshaw@gmail.com.
▾